U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1962

Herbert A. Morriss, Jr., and George C. Howard v. Georesearch, Inc.

Herbert A. Morriss, Jr., and George C. Howard v. Georesearch, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 27, 1962 · Tuttle, Rives, Wisdom
298 F.2d 442 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James A. Van Hook and Hargrove, Guyton & Van Hook, Shreveport, for appellants., Timothy E. Kelley, Dallas, Tex., L. W. Richey, Jena, Thompson, Knight, Wright & Simmons, Dallas, Tex., Gallaran and Richey, Jena, La., for appellee.

Herbert A. Morriss, Jr., and George C. Howard v. Georesearch, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful consideration of the contentions made by the appellants, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court was correct for the reasons set out in the able opinion written by the District Judge.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the trial court. See D.C., 193 F.Supp. 163.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.