McKenna v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision. The 11 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Donald F. Baker v. Henry Wade, District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas, Etc., Danny E. Hill, 47th District Attorney (5th Cir. 1985)
- Hall v. Holder (11th Cir. 1997)
- United States v. Brett Allen Bursey (5th Cir. 1975)
- Amalgamated Transit Union International, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor (D.C. Cir. 1985)
- Landreth Timber Company v. Landreth (9th Cir. 1984)
- Spring Construction Co. v. Harris (4th Cir. 1980)
- Alleghany Corporation v. Kirby (2d Cir. 1965)
- Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby (2d Cir. 1965)
- Armstrong v. Board Of Education Of Birmingham (5th Cir. 1963)
- United States v. Ross R. Barnett and Paul B. Johnson, Jr (5th Cir. 1963)
- Armstrong v. Board of Education of Birmingham (5th Cir. 1963)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Samuel Nakasian has sought to intervene as a party appellant in this cause. He was not a party to the action in the district court and, although he was fully aware that the cause was pending and of his interest, he made no effort to intervene. A court of appeals may, but only in an exceptional case for imperative reasons, permit intervention where none was sought in the district court—Morin v. City of Stuart, 5th Cir. 1939, 112 F.2d 585. No sufficient reason is shown for allowing intervention in this appeal. The motion will be denied without prejudice to an application by the movant to intervene in the district court should this cause be reversed and remanded. Holland v. Board of Public Instruction, 5th Cir. 1958, 258 F.2d 730.
Motion denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.