Thomson Machinery Co. v. LaRose
Thomson Machinery Co. v. LaRose
Opinion of the Court
This appeal involves, the validity and infringement of two patents,
After careful study and consideration, we agree with the result reached by the district court and substantially for the reasons stated in its opinion. The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
. Both issued to Royal J. LaRose and Edward P. Clause, the first numbered 2,799,984 and dated July 23, 1957, and the second numbered 2,871,645, dated February 3, 1959.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THOMSON MACHINERY COMPANY, Byron C. Thomson, Estival Aysen, Roland Clement, Ruby Thibodaux and Victor L. Wintz v. Royal J. LaROSE, Edward P. Clause and LaRose-Clause Company, Inc., Appellees Royal J. LaROSE, Edward P. Clause and LaRose-Clause Company, Inc. v. THOMSON MACHINERY COMPANY, Byron C. Thomson, Estival Aysen, Roland Clement, Ruby Thibodaux and Victor L. Wintz
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published