U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1964

Charles S. Woodruff v. Schering Corporation and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Globe Indemnity Co.

Charles S. Woodruff v. Schering Corporation and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Globe Indemnity Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 27, 1964 · Rives, Cameron, Hunter
324 F.2d 958 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Charles S. Woodruff v. Schering Corporation and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Globe Indemnity Co.

Opinion

*959 PER curiam:.

The unsuccessful plaintiff, recognizing the adequacy of the record to support the jury verdict against him, seeks a reversal because of alleged erroneous instructions. We have carefully examined the Court’s instructions and find them free from prejudicial error.

After a hard fought trial, the jury, with ample evidence and the opportunity to observe the witnesses, resolved the issues of negligence in favor of defendant. Appellant’s contentions are without merit. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.