The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama., 339 F.2d 261 (5th Cir. 1964)
1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3707

The Tri-State Corporation, Inc. v. The State of Alabama on the Relation of Richmond M. Flowers, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In a full and carefully documented opinion the district court properly decided this controversy. State of Alabama v. Kelley, M.D.Ala.1963, 214 F.Supp. 745. No good purpose would be served by this Court’s paraphrasing and expanding the opinion of the district court. Subject to further proceedings in the district court, in accordance with that court’s retention of jurisdiction for the purpose of determining any equities between the parties not previously determined, the judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
The TRI-STATE CORPORATION, Inc., Appellant, v. the STATE OF ALABAMA on the Relation of Richmond M. FLOWERS, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Appellee
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published