U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1965

Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 22, 1965 · Wisdom, Gewin, Brewster

340 F.2d 319; 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 288 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Leslie B. Young, New York City, Albert E. Mayer, Atlanta, Ga., Stanton T. Lawrence, Jr., New York City, Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, of counsel, for appellant., Charles H. Walker, New York City, M. Cook Barwick, Wilson, Branch, Barwick and Vandiver, Atlanta, Ga., Albert E. Fey, Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, of counsel, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1994)
Welsh Co. v. Victor A. Chernivsky, D/B/A Comfy Babe Company (7th Cir. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mohasco Industries, Inc., the plaintiff below, complains of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in favor of appellees (defendants) in an action for patent infringement. The trial court held that the patents in issue were invalid and void and not infringed by the defendants. We are in agreement with the result reached by the trial court. Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 191 (1963). The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.