Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Daugherty v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1982)
- Municipal Bond Corp. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1966)
- Morrison v. United States (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1978)
- Estate of Dean v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1975)
- Fabiani v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1973)
- Ridgewood Land Co. v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1972)
- United States v. Ada Belle Winthrop, Individually and as Under the Will of Guy L. Winthrop, Deceased (5th Cir. 1969)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The Government petitions for review of the Tax Court’s decision that the sale to the State Board of Education of Louisiana of a 17 acre tract, carved out of a much larger tract which had been laid out by developer Pontchartrain as a part of a joint venture development with the City of New Orleans of a negro housing and park area, was entitled to capital gains treatment. The Government insists that the sale was barred from capital gain treatment because the property was “held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of [its] trade or business.” Int. Rev.Code § 1221(1).
We affirm the judgment of the Tax Court, at the same time resisting the entreaties of the Taxpayer to thereby voice our approval of any broad standards perhaps suggested in the Tax Court’s opinion, so that they would become additional factors having, or thought to have, or hoped to have, some unique significance in this field which already suffers from a proliferation of tests. Thompson v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 1963, 322 F.2d 122, 127. Because on this record it is clear that by the time of the sale, the Taxpayer’s purposes with regard to this property had been so altered that the character of this part of the larger tract could no longer be considered as within § 1221(1), the Tax Court’s ultimate fact finding must be sustained.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.