U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1965

James W. Kindelan and Mary Kindelan v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 4, 1965 · Jones, Bell, Johnson

351 F.2d 310 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Thomas H. Anderson and Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, Fla., for appellants., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Robert N. Anderson, Edward I. Heilbronner, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., La-vinia L. Redd, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Fruehauf Corp. v. United States (Court of Claims 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court made findings of fact and conclusions of law which are the basis for its judgment from which this appeal was taken. Kindelan v. United States, S.D.Fla.1964, 233 F.Supp. 557. We find ourselves in agreement with the conclusions reached by the district court. See United States v. Howe, 9th Cir. 1965, 349 F.2d 483. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.