U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1965

Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 10, 1965

346 F.2d 152 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

George 0. Kluttz, Miami, Fla. (Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel), for appellantappellee., Richard P. Kenney, Williams, Salomon & Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellee-appellant.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

Florence Lustig Crossman v. Babs, Inc. (5th Cir. 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed to the extent that the appellant is to recover the principal amount of $6,000 and attorney’s fees of $1,500. The cross-appéllant is correct in its challenge of the inclusion in the judgment of the items for travel expense of witnesses and witness fees. There is no basis in the law for the allowance of these two items.

As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.