U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1965

Suhar v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 29, 1965

351 F.2d 952; 1967 A.M.C. 2487 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

George J. Garzotto, New Orleans, La., for appellant., Morton Hollander, Leavenworth Colby, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Louis R. Lucas, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Richard S. Salzman, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis C. La Cour, U. S. Atty., Morton Hollander, Richard S. Salzman, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

White v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Texas 1989)
Roosevelt Johnson v. United States of America and Panama Canal Company, Anthony Buckner v. United States of America and Panama Canal Company (5th Cir. 1969)
Andrew Anthony Aho v. United States (5th Cir. 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Our decision of this appeal is controlled by Patterson v. United States, 359 U.S. 495, 79 S.Ct. 936, 3 L.Ed.2d 971, and Johansen v. United States, 343 U.S. 427, 72 S.Ct. 849, 96 L.Ed. 1051. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.