Anthony D. Duke and Diane D. Duke v. Donald T. Heppleston and Joan M. Heppleston, His Wife

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Anthony D. Duke and Diane D. Duke v. Donald T. Heppleston and Joan M. Heppleston, His Wife, 386 F.2d 996 (5th Cir. 1968)

Anthony D. Duke and Diane D. Duke v. Donald T. Heppleston and Joan M. Heppleston, His Wife

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants have filed a motion to strike the brief of the appellees. We do not think that the brief is impertinent or prejudicial. The motion is denied.

The appeal on the merits involves the validity of a promissory note purporting to have been executed by an attorney-in-fact for the appellants with the contention being made that the power of attorney was invalid because of the failure to comply with the requirements of the law of New York where the power was executed. ■ This and the other questions in the ease were resolved, and we think properly, by the decision of the district court. Duke v. Heppleston, D.C. S.D.Fla., 258 F.Supp. 313. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anthony D. DUKE and Diane D. Duke, Appellants, v. Donald T. HEPPLESTON and Joan M. Heppleston, His Wife, Et Al., Appellees
Status
Published