U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1968

James W. Brewen v. United States

James W. Brewen v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 14, 1968 · Thornberry, Simpson, Suttle
396 F.2d 350; 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6525 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James W. Brewen, pro se., B. H. Timmins, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

James W. Brewen v. United States

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from the denial of a motion to vacate, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On a previous appeal, we reversed and remanded the case with the direction that there be a further evidentiary hearing with appellant present. Brewen v. United States, 5th Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 285. At the hearing, appellant, represented by court-appointed counsel, was present and testified. At the previous hearing, his former retained counsel had testified.

The district court held that appellant had not been, as he contended, indigent during the time in October, 1962, in which notice could have been filed for a direct appeal. It further held that his retained counsel, under the circumstances of the case, had no duty to advise him of his right to appeal or of the time limits for appeal and that the trial court had no such duty. Cf. Rule 32(a) (2), Fed.R.Crim. P., as amended effective July 1, 1966. A thorough study of the record in this case leads us to the conclusion that these findings are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.