Lawrence Ernest Pasta v. United States
Lawrence Ernest Pasta v. United States
396 F.2d 952; 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6248
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Lawrence Ernest Pasta v. United States
Opinion
The judgment of the district court denying the motion of appellant to proceed under Section 2255, Title 28 is correct. Appellant’s relief is clearly precluded by the decision of this court in Rosecrans v. United States, 378 F.2d 561 (CA 5-1965) and by the decision of *953 the Third Circuit in United States v. Gallagher, 183 F.2d 342 (CA 3-1950) cert. den. Gallagher v. United States, 340 U.S. 913, 71 S.Ct. 283, 95 L.Ed. 659.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.