James E. Suggs v. United States
Opinion
We have carefully considered each ground of appeal asserted by appellant following his conviction for passing and possessing counterfeit f 10 bills. We conclude that as to no asserted error preserved for review did the trial court commit prejudicial error.
The Judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James E. SUGGS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
- Status
- Published