U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1969

James S. Holder and Louise H. Holder v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 30, 1969 · Gewin, Goldberg, Dyer

412 F.2d 1189; 24 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5394; 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11282 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Roth-wacks, Lester B. Snyder, Mitchell Rogo-vin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Slaton Clemmons, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel, for appellant., Harry V. Lamon, Jr., Charles T. Zink, Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees., Jule M. Hannaford, Minneapolis, Minn., Dorsey, Marquart, Windhorst, West & Halladay, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel, for Medical Group Management Ass’n, amicus curiae.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Richlands Medical Ass'n v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issues presented in this case have been fully decided adversely to the appellant, United States of America, in Kurzner v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 97. 1

The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.

. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.