U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1969

Shale v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 7, 1969 · Ainsworth, Bell, Godbold

409 F.2d 412 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John Paul Howard, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner., Gary B. Tullís, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Grady Monroe Holsen v. United States (5th Cir. 1970)
Grady Monroe Holsen v. United States (5th Cir. 1970)
John P. Shale v. United States (5th Cir. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The district court has failed to make findings of facts and conclusions of law following an evidentiary hearing, as is required by Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.; Welch v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore, the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion for bail pending appeal is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.