U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1970

David Lawrence v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

David Lawrence v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 6, 1970 · Rives, Bell, Dyer
419 F.2d 1326 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

David Lawrence, pro se., Paul E. Gifford, Miami, Fla. (Ct. Apptd.), for appellant., Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, Miami, Fla., Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

David Lawrence v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

419 F.2d 1326

David LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 26767.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 12, 1970.

Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970.

See 90 S.Ct. 1281.

David Lawrence, pro se.

Paul E. Gifford, Miami, Fla. (Ct. Apptd.), for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, Miami, Fla., Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before RIVES, BELL, and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This appeal, filed sixty three days after the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, is dismissed.1 See Allen v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 384 F.2d 745. There is no showing that the failure to file the notice of appeal within the extended time period of 30 days provided under Rule 4(a), Federal Rules Appellate Procedure, was attributable to anyone other than appellant. We thus deem the case of Fallen v. United States, 1964, 378 U.S. 139, 84 S.Ct. 1689, 12 L.Ed.2d 760, to be inapplicable.

2

As to appellant's right to file an additional petition for writ on the same or other grounds in the District Court, see Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

3

Appeal dismissed.

Notes:

1

This appeal was dismissed by order of this court dated September 25, 1968. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 177. That order was vacated on November 20, 1968. The court then ordered that the motion be carried with the case for disposition. Council was appointed to represent appellant. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 404 F.2d 614

4

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

5

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.