Max Dritz as Administrator of the Estate of Max Dritz and of Helen Dritz, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tucker v. United States (Court of Claims 1985)
- Ritchie N. Stevens & Julie A. Keen Stevens v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 2020)
- Smith v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1984)
- James S. Plato v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 2018)
- Ruddy v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2017)
- GENTRY v. COMMISSIONER (United States Tax Court 2001)
- Martinez v. CIR (5th Cir. 1999)
- Philip S. Morgan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (6th Cir. 1986)
- Larvin v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1985)
- Stowman v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1983)
- Nilson v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1983)
- Scholle v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1982)
- Stonier v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1981)
- Conovitz v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 1980)
- Walker v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1980)
- Nagy v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1980)
- Millette & Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (5th Cir. 1979)
- Shapland v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1979)
- Armaganian v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1978)
- Jernigan v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1975)
- Anderson v. Commissioner (United States Tax Court 1973)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Largely because they failed to file federal income tax returns for the calendar years of 1962 and 1963, Max Dritz and his wife, Mrs. Helen Dritz, fell into a sea of difficulties with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue with reference to tax liabilities for the years 1958 to 1963. They filed four petitions in the United States Tax Court for redetermination of the deficiencies asserted against them. The cases were consolidated. The liability of the taxpayers was determined in findings of fact and an opinion of the Tax Court issued on August 27, 1969. 1
The taxpayers produced no records or documentation as to their income for the years in suit. Max Dritz did not testify. Mrs. Dritz testified, but the Court found her testimony to be evasive, inconsistent, and generally implausible.
We are now asked to reverse the Tax Court on the argument that the determinations of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue were arbitrary, that this put the burden of proof as to the various issues on the Commissioner, and hence *1177 the Tax Court resolved the factual issues by the wrong standard.
This argument fails. In view of all the facts, as duly found and for which there is substantial support in the record, there is no basis for saying that the determinations of the Commissioner were arbitrary. Nor do we find any other basis for reversal.
The decision of the Tax Court is, on all issues, affirmed.
Affirmed.
. Paragraph 69, 175 P-H Memo TC.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.