Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1970

David Rosen v. Reginald W. Godson, D/B/A Beach Tower and Franklin Nottage, the Travelers Indemnity Company, Garnishee-Appellee

David Rosen v. Reginald W. Godson, D/B/A Beach Tower and Franklin Nottage, the Travelers Indemnity Company, Garnishee-Appellee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 2, 1970 · Tuttle, Coleman, Simpson
428 F.2d 827; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10010 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Fuller & Brumer, and Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware, P. A., Miami, Fla., for appellant., George E. Bunnell, Gerard Pyszka, Dean, Adams, George & Wood, Miami, Fla., for appellee.

David Rosen v. Reginald W. Godson, D/B/A Beach Tower and Franklin Nottage, the Travelers Indemnity Company, Garnishee-Appellee

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

428 F.2d 827

David ROSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Reginald W. GODSON, d/b/a Beach Tower and Franklin Nottage, Defendants,
The Travelers Indemnity Company, Garnishee-Appellee.

No. 27595.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 2, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida at Miami; Emett C. Choate, Judge.

Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Fuller & Brumer, and Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware, P. A., Miami, Fla., for appellant.

George E. Bunnell, Gerard Pyszka, Dean, Adams, George & Wood, Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING OF 422 F.2d 1082 AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

1

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

SIMPSON, Circuit Judge (dissenting):

2

For reasons stated in my original dissent, I would grant the petition for rehearing. I do not believe en banc consideration is justified in this diversity case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.