U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1970

Lorenzo Richard Farnell v. Solicitor-General of the United States United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 20, 1970 · Dyer, Gewin, Goldberg, Per Curiam

429 F.2d 1318; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8088 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Lorenzo Richard Farnell, pro se., Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Neal R.. Sonnett, Asst. U. S. Atty., for respondents-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

A. Kenneth Hawkes v. Internal Revenue Service (6th Cir. 1972)
United States v. James Gibson (6th Cir. 1975)
DeLuna v. State (Wyo. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is a federal convict serving a two-year sentence for violating Title 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a). 1 He is not attacking that conviction, but he filed a petition in the court below seeking to have certain evidence produced for his inspection and other evidence suppressed. As the district court stated, motions for discovery and inspection and for suppression of evidence are available prior to trial but not at this late date. Rule 16, F.R.Crim.P.; United States v. Kessler. 2 The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

. Pursuant to our Rule 18 this case is decided without oral argument.

. 253 F.2a 290 (2d Cir. 1958).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.