Smith v. United States
Smith v. United States
Opinion of the Court
All the contentions made by appellant in this appeal from the denial of his motion brought under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
The appeal is dismissed.
. Although appellant styled his petition “habeas corpus” w.e will treat it as a § 2255 motion.
. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have direeted the clerk to place the case on the .Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joe SMITH v. United States
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published