U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1970

Schiener v. Post

Schiener v. Post
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 16, 1970 · Ainsworth, Coleman, Godbold
433 F.2d 357 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

R. S. Galloway, Ernest F. Foree, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants., Gerald P. Urbaek, Ray Besing, Dallas, Tex., for James H. Bond and A. D. Martin, Sr., Don L. Case, Thomas C. Unis, Patrick F. McGowan, Dallas, Tex., for Troy V. Post, Berl F. Godfrey, Shelby F. Peavy, Virgil H. Post, Horace H. Woodruff, Edward C. Acker, and E. Grant Fitts., Richard D. Haynes, Jo.e B. Abbey, Michael M. Boone, Dallas, Tex., for James H. Bond, William L. Carter, Jr., Marvin T. Minyard, John F. Moore, H. N. Pierce, Malcolm C. Thorne, Wilbur F. Wright, and B. J. McNabb.

Schiener v. Post

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 See also Herpieh et al. v. Wallace et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 792; Shell v. Hensley, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 819; Herpieh v. Wilder et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 818.

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.