U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1971

Arthur Stanley Kerns v. Charles McWilliams the Mobile Press Register, Inc., and the United Press International, Inc.

Arthur Stanley Kerns v. Charles McWilliams the Mobile Press Register, Inc., and the United Press International, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 15, 1971 · Bell, Dyer, Per Curiam, Roney
435 F.2d 1306; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12357 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Arthur Stanley Kerns v. Charles McWilliams the Mobile Press Register, Inc., and the United Press International, Inc.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles McWilliams, The Mobile Press Register, Inc. and the United Press International, Inc., defendants in this libel suit, were granted leave to take an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b) from an order of the District Court denying their motions for summary judgment.

After considering the briefs and oral arguments we conclude that the order allowing the interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted. Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 294.

Accordingly, the order heretofore allowing the interlocutory appeal is vacated and the case is remanded for trial on the issues of actual malice defamation and possible damages in accordance with the standards of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 1964, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. *1307 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 even, though the appellees are not public officials, since they were engaged in a matter of public interest and concern. Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 1967, 388 U.S. 130, 152-155, 87 S..Ct. 1975, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094; Time, Inc. v. Ragano, 5 Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 219; Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 858; Wasserman v. Time, Inc., 1970, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 7, 424 F.2d 920; Time, Inc. v. McLaney, 5 Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 565, cert. denied, 395 U.S. 922, 89 S.Ct. 1776, 23 L.Ed.2d 239.

Vacated and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.