U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1971

Henry J. Herren v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 29, 1971 · Tuttle, Thornberry, Ingraham

443 F.2d 1363 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert I. White, Robert L. Waters, George A. Hrdlicka, Houston, Tex., Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White & Waters, Houston, Tex., for appellant., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Stephen Schwartz, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Daniel L. Penner, U. S. Dept, of Justiee, Fort Worth, Tex., Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., James R. Gough, George R. Pain, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., William A. Friedlander, Atty., Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Lamb County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission (Tex. App. 2008)
Lamb County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas (Tex. App. 2008)
Luben Industries, Inc. v. United States (9th Cir. 1983)
Amchem Products, Inc. v. Gaf Corporation and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency (5th Cir. 1979)
20th Century Manufacturing Company v. The United States (Court of Claims 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

443 F.2d 1363

Henry J. HERREN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 31111.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 21, 1971.

Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 29, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; James L. Noel, Jr., Judge.

Robert I. White, Robert L. Waters, George A. Hrdlicka, Houston, Tex., Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White & Waters, Houston, Tex., for appellant.

Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Stephen Schwartz, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Daniel L. Penner, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Fort Worth, Tex., Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., James R. Gough, George R. Pain, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., William A. Friedlander, Atty., Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, THORNBERRY and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the trial is affirmed on the basis of the findings of fact and the thoroughly well-reasoned conclusions of the trial court. See 317 F.Supp. 1198 (S.D.Tex.).

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.