Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1971

Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia

Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1971 · Bell, Ainsworth, Godbold
446 F.2d 882 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order of the District Court dismissing plaintiffs’ third amended complaint is affirmed. We agree with the District Court that plaintiffs failed to set out “a short and plain statement of the claim” as required by Rule 8(a), Fed. R.Civ.P. We do not reach other grounds asserted as basis for the dismissal which is, of course, without prejudice.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑