Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia, 446 F.2d 882 (5th Cir. 1971)
Bell, Ainsworth, Godbold

Luz Acosta Diaz v. Carlos Subia

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order of the District Court dismissing plaintiffs’ third amended complaint is affirmed. We agree with the District Court that plaintiffs failed to set out “a short and plain statement of the claim” as required by Rule 8(a), Fed. R.Civ.P. We do not reach other grounds asserted as basis for the dismissal which is, of course, without prejudice.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Luz Acosta DIAZ Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carlos SUBIA Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Status
Published
↑