Ethel Stone Levy v. The New York Stock Exchange and Robert W. Haack, President
Ethel Stone Levy v. The New York Stock Exchange and Robert W. Haack, President
Opinion
It is clear in the instant case that there is no final judgment from which plaintiff may appeal. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. Plaintiff originally brought suit against numerous parties, only a portion of whom were dismissed by the district court’s orders of December 16, 1970 and March 1, 1971.
It is, therefore, ordered in the above entitled and numbered cause that the attempted appeal from the district court’s order of December 16, 1970 and its order dismissing several of the defendants on March 1, 1971 is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 1
. See Hamman v. United States, 9th Cir. 1968, 399 F.2d 673; Partin v. Hassan Motors, Inc., 6th Cir. 1966, 363 F.2d 104; Bush v. United Benefit Fire Ins. Co., 5th Cir. 1963, 311 F.2d 893; Miles v. City of Chandler, 9th Cir. 1961, 297 F.2d 690; Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1193.2 (Wright ed. Supp. 1970) ; Moore’s Federal Practice If 54.34 [2].
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.