U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1972

Robert W. O'COnnell v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 14, 1972 · Thornberry, Coleman, Ingraham

455 F.2d 521; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10762 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

The judgment below is affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

. In his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, appellant has alleged that his guilty plea was coerced by the eleven-month delay between his indictment and his arraignment, and consequently was denied the opportunity of having his federal sen-fence run concurrently with a state sentence imposed prior to his indictment.

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing-Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.