Linnus Harrison v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Florida State Prison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit June 14, 1972

Linnus Harrison v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Florida State Prison, 458 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1972)

Thornberry, Coleman, Ingraham

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed.1 See Local Rule 21.2

. The appellant in this habeas corpus appeal by a state prisoner has contended that: (1) he was placed in double jeopardy; (2) the trial judge made prejudicial statements in charging the jury; (3) his coerced confession was used against him at the trial; (4) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty of manslaughter ; (5) his privately-retained counsel was ineffective; and (6) the information upon which lie was convicted was invalid because allegedly not executed under oath.

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

070rehearing

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Reference

Full Case Name: Linnus HARRISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Florida State Prison, Respondent-Appellee
Status: Published