United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov
United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov
458 F.2d 1360
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
United States v. Alfonso Eduardo Ninov
Opinion
Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. The statements of Armenteros inculpating Ninov made during the commission of the crime were properly admitted into evidence, given the independent evidence of concert of action between the two. Migliore v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 786; United States v. Williams, 9 Cir., 1970, 435 F.2d 642; United States v. Bey, 3 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 188. In addition, there is no merit in the assignments of error based on an alleged insufficiency of the evidence.
1
. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.