U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1973

Ring Power Corp. v. Oil Screw Tug "Snipe"

Ring Power Corp. v. Oil Screw Tug "Snipe"
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 24, 1973
479 F.2d 1322; 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9761 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Gary B. Tullís, C. Wayne Alford, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant-appellant., Clark W. Toole, Jr., E. Dale Joyner, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Ring Power Corp. v. Oil Screw Tug "Snipe"

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal stems from the recognition of a maritime lien on the Oil Screw Tug “Snipe” in favor of Ring Power Corporation by the district court for the Middle District of Florida sitting in admiralty without a jury. The owners of the “Snipe” appeal. We affirm.

The basic question in this appeal is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to establish that the true owners of the tug, Transportation Equipment Leasing Corporation, authorized certain repairs to the vessel and waived a “no lien” provision in its contract with the charterer so as to create a lien under 46 U.S.C. § 971.

The court found that TEL had authorized the repairs, either expressly or implicitly through its actions. There is ample evidence to support this finding. We agree with the language of an earlier opinion from this circuit dealing with this same problem of authorization in which the court stated:

Consequently we think this case — a swearing match between live swearers whose credibility had to be, and was, *1323resolved by the Judge — must end with the trial Court since these findings were not clearly erroneous, (citations omitted) Yacht, Mary Jane v. Broward Marine, Inc., 5 Cir. 1963, 313 F.2d 516, 517.

Therefore, the judgment of the district court in this cause is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.