Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.
Beason v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.
494 F.2d 516; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8468
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Maude Lanham v. Tom Whitfield, Individually and as Sheriff of Columbia County, Georgia (11th Cir. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in permitting counsel for plaintiff to make a “unit of time” argument in the final portion of his closing argument. All of the protective features required by Baron Tube Co. v. Transport Insurance Co., 5 Cir., 1966, 365 F. 2d 858 (en banc), were employed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.