U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1975

Robert L. Kruse v. Robert E. Hampton

Robert L. Kruse v. Robert E. Hampton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided May 30, 1975 · Brown, Gewin, Per Curiam, Thornberry
513 F.2d 1231; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14440 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William H. McDermott, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants., Charles S. White-Spunner, U. S. Atty., Irwin W. Coleman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., Morton Hollander, Eloise E. Davies, Stephen F. Eilperin, Washington, D. C., Dept, of Justice, for defendants-appellees.

Robert L. Kruse v. Robert E. Hampton

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, and the contentions of the parties at oral argument, we have determined that appellants have failed to demonstrate error. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court opinion. 394 F.Supp. 764 (S.D.Ala. 1975).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.