U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1975

United States v. Louis M. Darensbourg

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 4, 1975 · Godbold, Skelton, Gee

524 F.2d 233 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Douglas M. Gonzales, U. S. Atty., Robert S. Leake, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellant., Alex Wall, Baton Rouge, La., for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Stephenson (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1979)
United States v. Zucco (District Court, W.D. New York 1982)
United States v. Nilsen (District Court, D. New Jersey 1980)
United States v. La Monte (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1978)
United States v. Simmons (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1978)
Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique (4th Cir. 1978)
United States v. Richard L. Swihart (6th Cir. 1977)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

524 F.2d 233

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis M. DARENSBOURG, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 74-2313.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 4, 1975.

Douglas M. Gonzales, U. S. Atty., Robert S. Leake, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Alex Wall, Baton Rouge, La., for defendant-appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Oct. 10, 1975, 5 Cir., 1975, 520 F.2d 985).

Before GODBOLD, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Associate Judge,* and GEE, Circuit Judge.

GEE, Circuit Judge:

In his petition for rehearing, defendant-appellee points out a factual inaccuracy in the preamble to our opinion. The fourth sentence in the opinion is therefore corrected to read as follows:

A search by authority of the warrant produced weapons, though not precisely those named in the warrant, including a sawed-off shotgun (of smaller gauge than that stated) allegedly used in the armed robbery of a drive-in grocery.

In all other respects, the Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge (dissenting):

For the reasons set out in my dissenting opinion, I dissent from the denial of petition for rehearing.

Of U. S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.