William J. Warner, Jr., Etc. v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the City of New Orleans, and Its Members, Capt. Alvin H. Rankin
William J. Warner, Jr., Etc. v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the City of New Orleans, and Its Members, Capt. Alvin H. Rankin
Dissenting Opinion
join (dissenting).
I dissent from the decision in this case on the grounds stated by me in the dissent in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, et al., 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, announced this day.
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in part and dissent in part in accordance with the views set forth in my partial concurrence and partial dissent in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio,
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I dissent in part and concur in part as set forth in my opinion in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 528 F.2d 499 [No. 74-3177] (CA 5, 1976), decided this day.'
Opinion of the Court
This appeal presents the same jurisdictional issues as are involved in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, today decided.
The trial court’s order dismissing the complaint for want of § 1983 jurisdiction was proper for the reasons stated by us in Muzquiz.
Affirmed.
Concurring in Part
(dissenting and concurring in part).
I dissent in part and concur in part as set forth in my opinion in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, decided this day.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William J. WARNER, Jr., Et Al., Etc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the POLICE PENSION FUND OF the CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, and Its Members, Capt. Alvin H. Rankin, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
- Cited By
- 12 cases
- Status
- Published