U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1976

United States v. Ruben Rojas

United States v. Ruben Rojas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 10, 1976 · Ainsworth, Clark, Per Curiam, Ro-Ney
538 F.2d 670 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Bennie E. Ray, Brownsville, Tex., for defendant-appellant., Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Robert A. Berg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

United States v. Ruben Rojas

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The search of appellant’s vehicle took place at the Sarita checkpoint which was the subject of Sifuentes v. United States, affirmed sub nom., United States v. Martinez-Fuerta, —— U.S.-, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976). The officer had probable cause to search the car after he detected the car interior smelled of alcohol and marijuana. The judgment of the district court finding appellant guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.