Raymond E. Davis v. Alabama Power Company
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Troiani v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1983)
- 27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1293, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,338 Dorothy Allen, Cross-Appellees v. United States Steel Corp., Cross-Appellants (5th Cir. 1982)
- Letson v. Liberty Mutual Insurance (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 1981)
- Simmons v. South Carolina State Ports Authority (District Court, D. South Carolina 1980)
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Alexander (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 1979)
- Trinity Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor (D.C. Cir. 1978)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
542 F.2d 650
92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3161, 79 Lab.Cas. P 11,502
Raymond E. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 74-4149.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
July 1, 1976.
Marshall Timberlake, H. Hampton Boles, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-appellant.
Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Henry I. Frohsin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Robert E. Kopp, Atty., John K. Villa, Atty., Appellate Section, Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before AINSWORTH, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion of District Judge Guin published in D.C., 383 F.Supp. 880 (1974).
RONEY, Circuit Judge (dissenting):
I respectfully dissent. All leaves of absence without regular pay are excluded from Accredited Service under Alabama Power Company's Pension Plan. The result reached by the district court accords greater benefits to an employee for leave of absence for military service than for any other leave of absence without pay. Like the Third and Tenth Circuits, I would hold that the benefits provided by the Pension Plan are not prerequisites of seniority under the Act. 50 U.S.C. App. § 459(c)(1) (1970). See Litwicki v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Ind., Inc., 505 F.2d 189 (3d Cir. 1974); Jackson v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 517 F.2d 1322 (10th Cir. 1975). I would reverse.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.