Goldtrap v. Conner
Goldtrap v. Conner
Opinion of the Court
This case, which has been much litigated in the Florida Courts, Growers Marketing Service, Inc. v. Conner, Fla.Dist.Ct.App., 1971, 249 So.2d 486; Jack’s Fruit Co. v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Fla., 1972, 261 So.2d 171, makes its second appearance in this Court, Jack’s Fruit Company v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., 5 Cir., 1973, 488 F.2d 493. The arguments conclusively show that the District Court had no jurisdiction in this case and accordingly the judgment entered is vacated and the case remand
VACATED and REMANDED with directions to dismiss.
. With this decision falls the supersedeas bond given by the appellant as well as any other liabilities imposed by the decree now vacated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.