U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1976

State v. Seeber

State v. Seeber
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 3, 1976 · Godbold, Graham, Simpson
538 F.2d 96 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., Myron H. Thompson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Henry H. Caddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief Environmental Protection Dir., Frederick S. Middleton, III, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants., Philip K. Maxwell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., amicus curiae for State of Tex., David C. Short, David D. Beals, Asst. Attys. Gen., Frankfort, Ky., amicus curiae for Com. of Ky., Jan E. Chatten, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., amicus curiae for State of Cal., Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Charles D. Stewart, William D. Mallard, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Birmingham, Ala., Kent Frizzell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Martin Green, Chief, Pollution Control Sec., James R. Walpole, Atty., Land & Nat’l Resources Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington D. C., Robert H. Marquis, Gen. Counsel, Tenn. Valley Auth., Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Beauchamp E. Brogan, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Justin M. Schwamm, Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., Wallace H. Johnson, Jacques B. Gelin, Larry G. Gutterridge, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

State v. Seeber

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Following grant of certiorari, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2643, 49 L.Ed.2d 384, the judgment of the District Court, which was reversed by the Court of Appeals, 502 F.2d 1238, is AFFIRMED, in light of Hancock v. Train, 425 U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2006, 48 L.Ed.2d 555 (1976).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.