U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1977

Robert Rasberry v. David Spradling, Etc.

Robert Rasberry v. David Spradling, Etc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 26, 1977 · Coleman, Godbold, Per Curiam, Tjoflat
558 F.2d 257 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Robert Rasberry v. David Spradling, Etc.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a § 1983 prisoner civil rights case. Rather than ruling on the sufficiency of the complaint under standards of Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), the court referred the matter to a Magistrate who made an independent, ex parte factual investigation, including interviews of one or more witnesses.

The Magistrate concluded that plaintiff could not prove any set of facts that would entitle him to recover, and recommended that the case be dismissed as frivolous. The district court accepted the recommendation and dismissed the suit as frivolous. This does not comport with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the governing case law.

VACATED and REMANDED for reconsideration under correct legal standards.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.