U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1977

Pugh v. Rainwater

Pugh v. Rainwater
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 18, 1977
562 F.2d 362 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Bruce S. Rogow, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants., Peter L. Nimkoff, Daniel S. Pearson, Louis M. Jepeway, Jr., Miami, Fla., amicus curiae, for Dade County Bar., Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, Fla., for Sutton, Rainwater, Ferguson, Adair, Snowden & Berkman., Ralph F. Miles, City Atty., for City of Hialeah, Hialeah, Fla., for Maynard., Aaron A. Foosaner, Miami Beach, Fla., for Perry., Joseph Pardo, Miami, Fla., for Segall., Jack Blumenfeld, Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Attys., Miami, Fla., for Gerstein., Joseph A. Waniek, City Atty., and Henry Edgar, Asst. City Atty. for Miami Beach, Miami Beach, Fla., for Pomerance., Alan H. Rothstein, Larry J. Hirsch, Asst. City Atty., for Miami, Montague Rosenberg, Asst. City Atty., Miami, Fla., Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, Fla., for Bernard Garmire.

Pugh v. Rainwater

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.