United States v. Herman C. Alonzo, A/K/A Roland Alonzo
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America (5th Cir. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Herman Alonzo appeals the order of the district court denying his Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence. We affirm.
Alonzo was convicted on nine counts of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine. He received a ten-year sentence. According to his brief, Alonzo “ moved to reduce his sentence to conform to the sentences of his co-defendants.” He has not challenged the legality of his sentence or the procedures that the district court followed in imposing it. The sentence was well within the statutory limit and Alonzo has not shown that the trial judge abused his discretion. Therefore, we affirm the order of the district court denying appellant’s Rule 35 motion. See United States v. Hayes, 5 Cir., 1979, 589 F.2d 811, 826-27.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.