U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1979

United States v. Denson

United States v. Denson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 30, 1979
593 F.2d 3 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

J. A. “Tony” Canales, U.S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Brian K. Landsberg, Joel L. Selig, Dennis J. Dimsey, Drew S. Days, III, John E. Huerta, Appellate Sec., Civil Rights Div., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant., Robert C. Bennett, Houston, Tex., for Denson., Michael W. Ramsey, Houston, Tex., for Orlando., Michael A. Andrews, Houston, Tex., for Janish., E. W. Barnett, B. J. Bradshaw, Leroy Jeffers, Houston, Tex., Tom Mills, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Nat’l Assn, of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., amici curiae.

United States v. Denson

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.