United States v. Antonio Santia-Manriquez and Alfredo Santiago-Rodriguez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Antonio Santia-Manriquez and Alfredo Santiago-Rodriguez, 609 F.2d 1162 (5th Cir. 1980)
1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21340
Goldberg, Per Curiam, Roney, Tjo-Flat

United States v. Antonio Santia-Manriquez and Alfredo Santiago-Rodriguez

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The Government has pointed out that United States v. Mclnnis, 601 F.2d 1319, 1323 (5th Cir. 1979), reached a different conclusion than our original opinion in this case, 603 F.2d 575, 577 & n.l (5th Cir. 1979) (per curiam), on whether the thirty-day period during which the Government must file a notice of appeal under Fed.R.App.P. 4(b) begins as of the date of an oral order or as of the date of the written order.

Accordingly, we delete the last two sentences of the first paragraph of the opinion and footnote one. In their place, the following sentences should be inserted at the end of the first paragraph: “On October 4, 1978, the district court handed down a written order embodying its July 28 verbal order, so both appeals are timely under Fed.R. App.P. 4(b). United States v. Mclnnis, 601 F.2d 1319,1323 (5th Cir. 1979). We find the district court’s ruling to be correct and affirm.”

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Antonio SANTIA-MANRIQUEZ and Alfredo Santiago-Rodriguez, Defendants-Appellees
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published