Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company, 614 F.2d 1083 (5th Cir. 1980)
Brown, Gewin, Per Curiam, Politz

Antonio M. Gonzalez v. Markle Manufacturing Company

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563, 570 (5th Cir. 1979).

In addition to the attorney’s fees heretofore allowed, the District Court shall award the Appellee a reasonable attorney’s fee for this appeal. See Christianburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412, 417, 98 S.Ct. 694, 697, 54 L.Ed.2d 648, 654 (1978).

2

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Reference

Full Case Name
Antonio M. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARKLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Published
↑