Wiley L. Bolden v. City of Mobile, Alabama
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Bolden v. City of Mobile, Ala. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
626 F.2d 1324
Wiley L. BOLDEN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 76-4210, 77-2042.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 15, 1980.
Charles B. Arendall, Jr., Mobile, Ala., Charles S. Rhyne, Washington, D. C., William S. Rhyne, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellants.
J. U. Blacksher, Larry Menefee, Mobile, Ala., Edward Still, Birmingham, Ala., Jack Greenberg, Eric Schnapper, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Dennis J. Dimsey, Atty., Civil Rights Div., Appellate Sect., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Miriam R. Eisenstein, Brian K. Landsberg, Walter W. Barnett, Attys., Drew S. Days, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Appellate Section, Civil Rights Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., amicus curiae for United States.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before WISDOM, SIMPSON and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment heretofore entered by the District Court in this case is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court's opinion in City of Mobile, Ala. v. Bolden, ---- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 1490, 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.