U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1980

Aretz v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 15, 1980 · Ainsworth, Anderson, Brown, Clark, Coleman, Fay, Garza, Gee, Godbold, Hatchett, Henderson, Hill, Johnson, Kravitch, Politz, Randall, Reavley, Roney, Rubin, Tate, Tjoflat, Vance

616 F.2d 254 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., Neil R. Peterson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Sp. Litigation, James P. Klapps, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Torts Sec., Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant., Frank P. Brannen, Perry Brannen, Jr., Savannah, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing én banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.