U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1980

United States v. City of Miami

United States v. City of Miami
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 26, 1980
625 F.2d 1310; 23 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1510 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Irving Weinsoff, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants., David L. Rose, Squire Padgett, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-ap-pellee., George F. Knox, Jr., Miami, Fla., for City of Miami.

United States v. City of Miami

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.