Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1981

Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm

Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1981 · Godbold, Brown, Coleman, Ainsworth, Clark, Roney, Gee, Tjo-Flat, Hill, Fay, Rubin, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Garza, Henderson, Reavley, Pol-Itz, Hatchett, Anderson, Randall, Tate, Williams
642 F.2d 98; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑