U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1981

United States v. Robert Hamm, United States of America v. Willis Judge Butler, Les Wallick Fuller, Dayton Bud Evans, Jr. And Larry Dale Washington

United States v. Robert Hamm, United States of America v. Willis Judge Butler, Les Wallick Fuller, Dayton Bud Evans, Jr. And Larry Dale Washington
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 23, 1981
644 F.2d 354; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13979 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Robert Hamm, United States of America v. Willis Judge Butler, Les Wallick Fuller, Dayton Bud Evans, Jr. And Larry Dale Washington

Opinion

644 F.2d 354

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert HAMM, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Willis Judge BUTLER, Les Wallick Fuller, Dayton Bud Evans,
Jr. and Larry Dale Washington, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 80-1315, 80-1331.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Unit A

April 23, 1981.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Joe J. Fisher, Judge.

1

Edward D. Foreman, Pros. Atty., Thomas E. Reynolds, St. Petersburg, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

2

William C. Bryson, Peter E. Scheer, Attys., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.

3

Randy Schaffer, Houston, Tex., for Washington.

4

Melvyn C. Bruder, Dallas, Tex., for Butler & Evans (Fuller).

5

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

6

(Opinion March 2, 1981, 5 Cir., 638 F.2d 823)

7

Before BROWN, COLEMAN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

8

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

9

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.