U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1981

United States v. John M. Haydel, Jr., A/K/A "Ice Cream" and "Mugsy"

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 17, 1981 · Skelton, Rubin, Reavley

664 F.2d 84 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Virgil M. Wheeler, Jr., New Orleans, La., Herbert Shafer, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant., C. Michael Hill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

19 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Jackson (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
Calloway v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1988)
United States v. Bruce Christian Brown and James Patrick Manikowski (11th Cir. 1984)
State v. Curbello-Rodriguez (Wis. Ct. App. 1984)
United States v. Crisp (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2008)
United States v. Cherna (5th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Marvin B Cherna (5th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Conner (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1996)
United States v. James Hamilton (5th Cir. 1991)
Garcia-Lavin v. Florida Department of Professional Regulation (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
United States v. Gerena (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1987)
Sadie v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
United States v. Jose G. Cantu and Shirley A. Fontenot (5th Cir. 1985)
United States v. Santos Charles, Jr. And Steven McAninch (5th Cir. 1984)
United States v. Jose Celso Garcia, Michael Trupei (11th Cir. 1984)
United States v. Larry Wayne Cassity (81-1565), Billy Sword (81-1566), Stephen Gordon Lenk (81-1567) (6th Cir. 1983)
United States v. Williams (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1983)
United States v. Torres (11th Cir. 1983)
United States v. George Wuagneux (11th Cir. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 8, 5 Cir., 1981, 649 F.2d 1152).

Before SKELTON ** , Senior Judge, RUBIN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The opinion is corrected so that the last paragraph before Part I of the opinion reads as follows:

“Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, five of the remaining counts were dismissed. Haydel stipulated that his trial on four counts would be to the court on the stipulated testimony of five U.S. Special Agents and certain exhibits listed on a stipulated exhibit list, subject to the objections previously raised by Haydel and his motions to suppress. Sitting without a jury, the district court found that Haydel had made a material understatement of his income and that he was guilty of all four counts of violating the applicable tax statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). Haydel was sentenced to one year on the first count and five years of probation on the remaining three counts.”

With this correction, the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge of this Administrative Unit in regular active service having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16; Fifth Circuit Judicial Council Resolution of January 14, 1981), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.